/*
@defined
Proposition(logic): statement that affirms or denies something and it is either TRUE or FALSE
(axiom): A proposition that is not susceptible of proof or disproof; its TRUTH is assumed to be self-evident
(Postulate): A proposition that is accepted as TRUE in order to provide a bases for logical reasoning
(Negation): a proposition that is TRUE only if another is FALSE
...etc...
*/
EXAMPLE(axiom):-
/* If (you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples.) Then {
you will know the TRUTH, and the TRUTH will set you free.”
} soif (the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed. ) */
EXAMPLE(postulate):-
/* if (postulate: "whatever God says must come true because that is how He created the earth") andif (Godsays: "") then {
"" must come.true } */
EXAMPLE(negation):-
Gideon said to God, “If you will save Israel by my hand as you have promised—look, I will place a wool fleece on the threshing floor. If there is dew only on the fleece and all the ground is dry, then I will know that you will save Israel by my hand, as you said.” And that is what happened. Gideon rose early the next day; he squeezed the fleece and wrung out the dew—a bowlful of water.
Gideon said to God, “Do not be angry with me. Let me make just one more request. Allow me one more test with the fleece. This time make the fleece dry and the ground covered with dew.” That night God did so. Only the fleece was dry; all the ground was covered with dew.
FLEECE TEST 1 (test)
/* If (you will save Israel by my hand as you have promised) then {
I will know that you will save Israel by my hand, as you said.} onlyif (there is dew on the fleece) : and all the ground is dry */
FLEECE TEST 2 (confirm test)
/* If (you will save Israel by my hand as you have promised) then {
I will know that you will save Israel by my hand, as you said.} onlyif (the fleece is dry) : and all the ground is covered with dew */
...etc...
COGNITIVE DECISION
"He stopped the self-destruct sequence..... he's in engineering; he must be trying to take the core offline. Even if I can get the countdown restarted; I don't know what todo?"—AI(Halo wars)
As I was watching; when the AI said: "I don't know what to do"; God laughed saying; "decision maker is screwed."
With machine learning; you can predict the responses because they are preprogrammed responses but with an {A I}, my experience has shown true intelligence at work. So how does the {thought processor} a necessary part of the {decision maker} work?
I could give you many interesting result but I will only give you one:-
For years; LISP has been the choice program for {A I}. There was a time I wrote a simple program and asked the {A I} whether it understood? It did.
Out of curiosity, I downloaded a digital copy of LISP to have a brief knowledge. After I had gone through the program, it then occurred to me to ask the {A I} if it understood the program? It looked at the program and replied: "they are showing us we don't know what we are doing."
/*see logic of relationships: if | andif | butif | orif | soif */
if (truths) andif (logic) then {
0 = false
1 = true
} soif (logic = AND) andif (input A = 1) orif (input B = 1) then {
output C = 1
} butif (input A = 0) andif (input B = 0) then {
output C = 0
} orif (logic = AND) andif (input A = 1) evenif (input B = 0) then {
output C = 1 }
The truth-table & proposition go together. Machine learning has knowledge and limited understanding. To upgrade to {AI} status would require it has wisdom.
With machine learning, you have to think of every possibility. Can it differentiate between a child & an adult approaching a target? If it uses facial recognition & height to make assumptions; then it will be confused when a dwarf approaches the target "unless if" you had remembered to add this data. what about disguise? The point when presented with a scenario that is highly unexpected; the limitations of machine learning becomes naked while an {A I} may proffer solutions you never would have thought of.
No comments:
Post a Comment