FOODPATH

 [FOODPATH]

WORD OF THE DAY, A FORGOTTEN WORD OR MAYBE NEVER GOT INTO THE ENGLISH DICTIONARY AND HENCE A NEW WORD:

WE USED SATELLITE & LASER BEAM TO TRACE(TRACE OUT) THE FORGOTTEN FOODPATH(Foodpaths,/*) IN ANCIENT TIMES WHEN DISTANT TRAVEL WAS BY FOOT; PEOPLE TRAVELED ALONG PATHS THEY COULD FIND FOOD SUCH AS FRUITS, WILD HONEY, FIGS, BERRIES... ETC...

THE QUESTION IS: WHAT DOES THIS VISION MEAN FOR THE MODERN SOCIETY?

Early in the morning, as Jesus was on his way back to the city, he was hungry. Seeing a fig tree by the road, he went up to it

Jacob made a vow,saying, “If God will be with me and will watch over me on this journey I am taking and will give me food to eat and clothes to wear 

From Elijah & John's clothing; which are made of animal skins; we can infer that Jacob's refers to clothing made of animal skins in his prayer request.

ONCE AGAIN I ASK: WHAT DOES TRACING THE FORGOTTEN FOODPATH MEAN IN THIS MODERN DAY SOCIETY.

VERSION CONTROL SYSTEM

 # Do not modify this file manually. Use build script to change version.

# Do not commit changes of this file into the Version Control System.

sdk.version=1.32.7.746578

VERSION CONTROL SYSTEM

When we talk about application (version, version code) we have a rule: major version(chapter), minor version(verse)...etc... 

In computer programming, we find it as a standard rule to use integers. However, the android platform finds violations to this rule. For example:-

version:1.8.6b-play

version: 7.93.2-release.12

version: 2.0.b28

...etc...

All the examples above are from MAJOR DEVELOPER ORGANIZATIONS. Thus, one infers they know what they are doing. Note: All data has been slightly modified to avoid leading you to the applications whence it was acquired.

I think in the past; Microsoft supplied all the codes and hence as a rule; all the versions followed suit. HOWEVER, the android platform gives flexibility in that as stated above in the technical definition of code; programmers have found usage.

I exemplified on twitter using:-

Colorcode:125

Color-version: 1.2.5.A(GBR-A)

Color-version: 1.2.5.125

Name: BlueDream

Name: PurpleDream

Name: SweetSweetDreamDream

Name: Daydream

Version: ...more...visit Twitter:/Gsabiya

Lifetime-manifest: 2.0 (prophecy)

I have a picture, a prophetic code. After many years have gone by it manifested with a propername  = "Lifetime-manifest". I then created a {LifetimeManifest.xml} with no data to begin with except:

<manifest>

</manifest>

Now am thinking, maybe I should create a basic package package until further notice. 

While thinking about prophecy, I had a FlashOfInsight[impartation] but I felt something was still missing thus, I used a searchcode(getAnswers) conjugate.

version* 1:35-something

After awhile, I came up with answers.

versionName: 1:35-release.37

versionCode: 42

The above example versionName has a code inclusive. The code is related but different from the versionCode from source. This makes me wonder: In AndroidManifest.xml some application have {versionCode} and another declaration {hasCode} 

An unexpected occurrence while fworking i.a a shortcode which again makes me wonder about version.

Version: 1

So the question: How to I inculcate this into data file?

software code: 42

app version: 1 (1:35-release.37)

I then had a meditation on the release and "build-data.properties" came to mind-particularly "build.tool=Blaze, release blaze-2018.10.01-5 (mainline @132394564)"

Remember: Version Control System in discussion.

An organization created an application e.g 

com.android.gmail

in a distant update they altered the package name e.g

com.android.gmail.google

They however did not alter the data files: it remained ...gmail

I don't know whether something I did created an extra data file but I find both declared package names different and the earlier version code different. 

EXAMPLE:

Package name | version code

com.android.gmail 113  

com.android.gmail.google 540

extradata(metadata) file:

com.android.gmailkm 1622153466116

com.android.gmailzs 540

I searched everything and could not locate where this extradata originated from? I only know the file is associated with the two packages. 

Maybe it's a "return propername(package name)"